What are Google preferred sources?
Google preferred sources let a reader pin the sites they trust, after which Google shows those sites more often and marks them with a “preferred” badge in Top Stories, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Google says people are about twice as likely to click a preferred source. It is free, it takes one link, and it is the rare AI-visibility lever that somebody else pulls on your behalf. The catch sits in that same sentence: it amplifies you among people who already chose you, which makes it a loyalty multiplier rather than a discovery channel.
How does someone make you a preferred source?
Three ways, each one click for the reader. They can search for your site inside Google’s source preferences tool, they can follow a deeplink you publish, or they can pick from the list beside Top Stories on a news-style result.
The deeplink is the one you control, and it looks like this:
https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=yourdomain.comPoint a link at that and anyone signed into Google lands on a page with your site ready to add. Google’s documentation also offers translated badge graphics if you would rather use their wording than your own. A reader’s selections are personal to them and apply anywhere they are signed in.
Where does the preferred badge actually show up?
On three surfaces: Top Stories, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Top Stories is available globally in every language Google Search supports, and the two AI surfaces work wherever those features have launched.
The AI coverage is what changed the calculation. At launch this was a news-publisher feature and Top Stories was the whole story, which is why most write-ups still frame it that way. It is now one of the few documented ways to influence what an AI answer surface shows a specific person, which moves it out of news-publisher territory and into ordinary AI Overviews work.
Is your site eligible?
Almost certainly, and you can check in ten seconds: open google.com/preferences/source?q=yourdomain.com and see whether your site comes up. If it appears in that tool, you are eligible.
Two constraints are worth knowing. Preference works at domain and subdomain level only, so example.com and blog.example.com can each be preferred while example.com/blog cannot. And to appear in AI Overviews and AI Mode specifically, your site has to be included in Search generative AI features in Search Console.
There is also a quiet warning inside the tool itself: sources that are not updated regularly may become unavailable. Eligibility rewards a publishing habit, and it decays without one.
How do you ask without being annoying?
Ask after you have delivered something, never before it. The request costs your reader a trip to google.com and a signed-in Google account, which makes it an expensive favour at the wrong moment and a cheap one at the right moment. The end of an article, the site footer, and a thank-you page after someone converts are all the right moment. We use all three here.
Never gate anything behind it. There is no callback and no API, so you cannot verify that anyone actually added you, which leaves a gate as either unenforceable theatre or a way to lose people at your most valuable moment. Free tools that hide their results behind an action are the reason “free checker” so often reads as bait and switch, and that is an expensive reputation to buy for a feature that pays out this slowly.
Who does this actually help?
Sites with repeat readers that already rank. The badge only fires when you were going to appear anyway, and the lift lands on click-through among people who have already picked you. If you publish weekly and readers recognise your name, that compounds nicely. If you are new, or you sit on page four for your commercial queries, it multiplies a number that is currently zero.
So put it behind the basics. Most sites lose AI visibility on access and answer shape long before reader preference has anything to amplify: when we scanned the web’s top 1,500 domains, 45% graded D or F, mostly on problems that take an afternoon to fix. Earn the appearances first, then collect the preferences.
What can go wrong with it?
The tool has a spam problem. Reporting has found domain squatters, scrapers, and lookalike domains listed alongside real publishers, which means Google will tighten the rules at some point. Build on this, do not depend on it.
You also cannot measure it. Preferred-source clicks arrive as ordinary organic traffic, with no dimension in Search Console or your analytics separating them out, so there is no way to attribute a single visit to the feature. Treat it as a free option rather than a channel: add the link, mention it once, and keep your attention on the numbers you can actually move.
See where your site stands. The free scan takes about fifteen seconds and shows every fix.
Check whether AI can read your site